Zdroje informací pro profesionály v oboru IT > Domovská stránka fór > WSUS > WSUS 3.0 SP1 Clients Not Reporting Correctly
Odeslat dotazOdeslat dotaz
 

OdpovědětWSUS 3.0 SP1 Clients Not Reporting Correctly

  • 1. července 2009 8:17Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Obsahuje kód
    Hi,

    I have a WSUS 3.0 SP1 server serving as our main Upstream Server. I am having issues sending patches out to clients for the past few weeks (only just noticed it yesterday).

    The issue is that patches that were released on the June Patch Tuesday are saying they are Not Applicable to all of my servers. After I have approved the updates, I go to update the client and get the below in the windowsupdate.log file. Any ideas? I saw in a post recently that the evaluate rule failure is something Microsoft are looking into but it was only a passing reference and have found nothing since.

    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	d50	AU	Triggering AU detection through DetectNow API
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	d50	AU	Triggering Online detection (non-interactive)
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	7c0	AU	#############
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	7c0	AU	## START ##  AU: Search for updates
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	7c0	AU	#########
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	7c0	AU	<<## SUBMITTED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {EDC6BFEF-0E4E-4A90-8C1A-0A5BBFB67032}]
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	dd4	Agent	*************
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	dd4	Agent	** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	dd4	Agent	*********
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	dd4	Agent	  * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	dd4	Agent	  * Criteria = "IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and IsAssigned=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1"
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:143	1012	dd4	Agent	  * ServiceID = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:159	1012	dd4	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wuident.cab:
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:175	1012	dd4	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:206	1012	dd4	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wuident.cab:
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:206	1012	dd4	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:221	1012	dd4	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wsus3setup.cab:
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:237	1012	dd4	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:237	1012	dd4	Setup	***********  Setup: Checking whether self-update is required  ***********
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:237	1012	dd4	Setup	  * Inf file: C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wsus3setup.inf
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:237	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\cdm.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:237	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:237	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:237	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuauclt.exe: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups2.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuweb.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	09:04:57:253	1012	dd4	Setup	  * IsUpdateRequired = No
    2009-07-01	09:05:04:175	1012	dd4	PT	+++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing server updates  +++++++++++
    2009-07-01	09:05:04:175	1012	dd4	PT	  + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2009-07-01	09:05:06:518	1012	dd4	Agent	WARNING: Failed to evaluate Installed rule, updateId = {A901C1BD-989C-45C6-8DA0-8DDE8DBB69E0}.103, hr = 8024E001
    2009-07-01	09:05:07:190	1012	dd4	PT	+++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing extended update info  +++++++++++
    2009-07-01	09:05:07:190	1012	dd4	PT	  + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:581	1012	dd4	Agent	  * Found 0 updates and 52 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 675 out of 902 deployed entities
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	dd4	Agent	*********
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	dd4	Agent	**  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	dd4	Agent	*************
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	1c4	AU	>>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {EDC6BFEF-0E4E-4A90-8C1A-0A5BBFB67032}]
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	1c4	AU	  # 0 updates detected
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	1c4	AU	#########
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	1c4	AU	##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates [CallId = {EDC6BFEF-0E4E-4A90-8C1A-0A5BBFB67032}]
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	1c4	AU	#############
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	1c4	AU	AU setting next detection timeout to 2009-07-01 11:18:47
    2009-07-01	09:05:08:643	1012	1c4	AU	Setting AU scheduled install time to 2009-07-02 02:00:00
    2009-07-01	09:05:13:643	1012	dd4	Report	REPORT EVENT: {F8187730-F1E4-49FC-BBD5-676B2A647D43}	2009-07-01 09:05:08:643+0100	1	147	101	{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}	0	0	AutomaticUpdates	Success	Software Synchronization	Windows Update Client successfully detected 0 updates.
    2009-07-01	09:05:13:643	1012	dd4	Report	REPORT EVENT: {4CEA87DB-2B7D-4B68-9917-7E6203F34885}	2009-07-01 09:05:08:643+0100	1	156	101	{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}	0	0	AutomaticUpdates	Success	Pre-Deployment Check	Reporting client status.
    2009-07-01	09:11:27:536	1012	dd4	Report	Uploading 2 events using cached cookie, reporting URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ReportingWebService/ReportingWebService.asmx
    2009-07-01	09:11:27:630	1012	dd4	Report	Reporter successfully uploaded 2 events.
    

Odpovědi

  • 2. července 2009 16:05Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Odpovědět
    To me this shows that the server is working correctly for distributing patches that are already shown to be needed by clients, but it seems to be going wrong with clients reporting new patches that it needs.

    As noted above... the WUAgent can only report on what it can *see* at the server. If the new updates are "invisible" to the WUAgent during the update scan, then it cannot report any status for the update. Remember, everything happens from the WUAgent. The WSUS Server is just a passive player in this game, answering queries to a database of available updates, and providing binary packages for download when requested. But if those queries are returning defective information, then the WUAgent can't "Comment on" updates it doesn't know about.

    Thus my suggestion to completely UNAPPROVE (maybe even DECLINE), and then REAPPROVE those June updates -- the intent being to 'reset' anything that might have gotten incorrectly set by a dysfunctional approval the first time through (like inadvertently setting the Decline or Expire bitflag on the updates - which would cause exactly this behavior).


    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 5. srpna 2009 9:29Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Odpovědět

    I seem to have found the issue. It seems that from the June 2009 updates released by Microsoft, there is no longer support for Server 2003 SP1. This is what the machines that are not reporting correctly are running. I installed SP2 on my WSUS server and immediately after rebooting it started reporting correctly.

    Thanks.

    • Označen jako odpověďKeir Nolan 13. srpna 2009 10:24
    •  

Všechny reakce

  • 1. července 2009 13:11Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    This log looks incomplete.. several expected entries are missing.

    Notwithstanding the missing entries, it looks like the basic issue is that this client is not detecting against the correct target group -- thus no detection of approved updates.

    How did you assign groups? What group should this machine be a member of?

    Please rerun this command: wuauclt /resetauthorization /detectnow and post the log entries from that detection event.
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 1. července 2009 13:28Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Obsahuje kód

    I have run that command have received the below results in the log file.

    The groups are assigned by creating them in WSUS, then when a computer is built and appears in the Unassigned Computers group, they are added to their correct group. This machine is a member of the WSUS Group that I have created, and it is the WSUS server itself.

    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	874	AU	Triggering AU detection through DetectNow API
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	874	AU	Triggering Online detection (non-interactive)
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	7c0	AU	#############
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	7c0	AU	## START ##  AU: Search for updates
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	7c0	AU	#########
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	7c0	AU	<<## SUBMITTED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {409102A4-E06D-48F6-8C1D-2963AFB00DE6}]
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Agent	*************
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Agent	** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Agent	*********
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Agent	  * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Agent	  * Criteria = "IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and IsAssigned=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1"
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Agent	  * ServiceID = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wuident.cab:
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:005	1012	fa4	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:271	1012	fa4	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wuident.cab:
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:271	1012	fa4	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:302	1012	fa4	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wsus3setup.cab:
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:302	1012	fa4	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:318	1012	fa4	Setup	***********  Setup: Checking whether self-update is required  ***********
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:318	1012	fa4	Setup	  * Inf file: C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wsus3setup.inf
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\cdm.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuauclt.exe: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups2.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuweb.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-01	14:26:25:333	1012	fa4	Setup	  * IsUpdateRequired = No
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:240	1012	fa4	PT	+++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing server updates  +++++++++++
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:240	1012	fa4	PT	  + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:412	1012	fa4	PT	WARNING: Cached cookie has expired or new PID is available
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:412	1012	fa4	PT	Initializing simple targeting cookie, clientId = 3aa1cf0f-cbd5-4ab7-b6aa-c2b879ff6961, target group = , DNS name = camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:412	1012	fa4	PT	  Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/SimpleAuthWebService/SimpleAuth.asmx
    2009-07-01	14:26:34:568	1012	fa4	Agent	WARNING: Failed to evaluate Installed rule, updateId = {A901C1BD-989C-45C6-8DA0-8DDE8DBB69E0}.103, hr = 8024E001
    2009-07-01	14:26:35:271	1012	fa4	PT	+++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing extended update info  +++++++++++
    2009-07-01	14:26:35:271	1012	fa4	PT	  + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:740	1012	fa4	Agent	  * Found 0 updates and 52 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 675 out of 902 deployed entities
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	fa4	Agent	*********
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	fa4	Agent	**  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	fa4	Agent	*************
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	>>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {409102A4-E06D-48F6-8C1D-2963AFB00DE6}]
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	  # 0 updates detected
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	#########
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates [CallId = {409102A4-E06D-48F6-8C1D-2963AFB00DE6}]
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	#############
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	AU setting next detection timeout to 2009-07-01 17:25:00
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	Setting AU scheduled install time to 2009-07-02 02:00:00
    
  • 1. července 2009 19:08Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Obsahuje kód
    I have run that command have received the below results in the log file.

    The groups are assigned by creating them in WSUS, then when a computer is built and appears in the Unassigned Computers group, they are added to their correct group. This machine is a member of the WSUS Group that I have created, and it is the WSUS server itself.
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:412	1012	fa4	PT	WARNING: Cached cookie has expired or new PID is available
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:412	1012	fa4	PT	Initializing simple targeting cookie, clientId = 3aa1cf0f-cbd5-4ab7-b6aa-c2b879ff6961, target group = , DNS name = camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:32:412	1012	fa4	PT	  Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/SimpleAuthWebService/SimpleAuth.asmx
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:34:568	1012	fa4	Agent	WARNING: Failed to evaluate Installed rule, updateId = {A901C1BD-989C-45C6-8DA0-8DDE8DBB69E0}.103, hr = 8024E001
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:35:271	1012	fa4	PT	+++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing extended update info  +++++++++++
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:35:271	1012	fa4	PT	  + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:740	1012	fa4	Agent	  * Found 0 updates and 52 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 675 out of 902 deployed entities
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	fa4	Agent	*********
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	fa4	Agent	**  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	fa4	Agent	*************
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	>>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {409102A4-E06D-48F6-8C1D-2963AFB00DE6}]
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	  # 0 updates detected
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	#########
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates [CallId = {409102A4-E06D-48F6-8C1D-2963AFB00DE6}]
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	#############
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	AU setting next detection timeout to 2009-07-01 17:25:00
    
    2009-07-01	14:26:36:756	1012	4cc	AU	Setting AU scheduled install time to 2009-07-02 02:00:00
    
    Thank you for the feedback.

    What is the exact name of the WSUS group you have created?

    How many updates have been APPROVED for installation for this WSUS group?



    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 2. července 2009 8:43Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    Group name is - "WSUS"
    I just recently approved all of the patches for the June Patch Tuesday for this group and all of my other groups, however they did not download them.

    Have you seen the Failed To Evaluate Rule error before?

    On the client it seemed to have started happening around the 23rd June about 4am (checked on a couple of machines). Do you know what could cause this rule error?

    Thanks.
  • 2. července 2009 8:48Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    I am also seeing this in the SoftwareDistribution.log log file in the Update Services installation folder:

    Warning w3wp.5 SoapUtilities.CreateException ThrowException: actor = http://[Server URL]/ClientWebService/client.asmx, ID=119a036a-cf2f-4625-87da-ce6c3868e9d3, ErrorCode=ConfigChanged, Message=, Client=2ccd5d21-6e4f-4690-8f4e-2f5827bb6334

    Not sure if that helps?
  • 2. července 2009 14:18Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    Group name is - "WSUS"
    I just recently approved all of the patches for the June Patch Tuesday for this group and all of my other groups, however they did not download them.

    Have you seen the Failed To Evaluate Rule error before?

    On the client it seemed to have started happening around the 23rd June about 4am (checked on a couple of machines). Do you know what could cause this rule error?

    Thanks.

    The "Failed to Evaluate" rule is known and under investigation and is not related to the issue of the June updates being undetected.

    Try this please: On the WSUS Server, remove the approvals for the June updates, and then reapply the approvals. I have no logical reasoning for this suggestion but in a separate thread a week or so ago, another person did exactly that and resolve a very similar issue.
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 2. července 2009 14:20Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    Without a time stamp, it's hard to correlate against the other information, but generally this is a normal indication if a configuration change on the WSUS Server really did happen at the timestamp of this log entry.
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 2. července 2009 15:00Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    OK i will try that.

    None of the clients are reporting that they need the patches that have been released. They claim they are all up to date, and the new patches that were released in June are saying they are "Not Applicable". Even if they are not picking up the fact that the patches have been approved surely they should be saying that they need the patches?
  • 2. července 2009 15:35Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Obsahuje kód
    I have just removed all approvals for the WSUS group. I then ran a report to seek what updates were needed by the server in that group. It needed about 12 updates, all or which were update rollups, none were Critical or Security patches.

    I approved .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1 on that group and the server in the group downloaded it immediately. I've added the windowsupdate.log below. To me this shows that the server is working correctly for distributing patches that are already shown to be needed by clients, but it seems to be going wrong with clients reporting new patches that it needs. Is there any troubleshooting you know for this scenario?

    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	1f4	AU	Triggering AU detection through DetectNow API
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	1f4	AU	Triggering Online detection (non-interactive)
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	808	AU	#############
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	808	AU	## START ##  AU: Search for updates
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	808	AU	#########
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	808	AU	<<## SUBMITTED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {B88D4167-44C4-4D0D-83B2-D43DE4FEE84F}]
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	3cc	Agent	*************
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	3cc	Agent	** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	3cc	Agent	*********
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	3cc	Agent	  * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	3cc	Agent	  * Criteria = "IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and IsAssigned=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1 or IsHidden=0 and IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and IsAssigned=1 and RebootRequired=1"
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	3cc	Agent	  * ServiceID = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:734	1280	3cc	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wuident.cab:
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:750	1280	3cc	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:750	1280	3cc	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wuident.cab:
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:750	1280	3cc	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:765	1280	3cc	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wsus3setup.cab:
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:781	1280	3cc	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:781	1280	3cc	Setup	***********  Setup: Checking whether self-update is required  ***********
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:781	1280	3cc	Setup	  * Inf file: C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Default\wsus3setup.inf
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:843	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\cdm.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuapi.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuauclt.exe: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaucpl.cpl.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuaueng.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll.mui: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wups2.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	Update NOT required for C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuweb.dll: target version = 7.1.6001.65, required version = 7.1.6001.65
    2009-07-02	16:17:15:859	1280	3cc	Setup	  * IsUpdateRequired = No
    2009-07-02	16:17:16:109	1280	3cc	PT	+++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing server updates  +++++++++++
    2009-07-02	16:17:16:109	1280	3cc	PT	  + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2009-07-02	16:17:18:515	1280	3cc	Agent	WARNING: Failed to evaluate Installed rule, updateId = {A901C1BD-989C-45C6-8DA0-8DDE8DBB69E0}.103, hr = 8024E001
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:062	1280	3cc	PT	+++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing extended update info  +++++++++++
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:062	1280	3cc	PT	  + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ClientWebService/client.asmx
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	3cc	Agent	  * Added update {5D2787CB-BCB5-439D-B734-3E6F1B21B2DD}.103 to search result
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	3cc	Agent	  * Found 1 updates and 52 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 675 out of 902 deployed entities
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	3cc	Agent	*********
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	3cc	Agent	**  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	3cc	Agent	*************
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	19c	AU	>>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {B88D4167-44C4-4D0D-83B2-D43DE4FEE84F}]
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	19c	AU	  # 1 updates detected
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	19c	AU	#########
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	19c	AU	##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates [CallId = {B88D4167-44C4-4D0D-83B2-D43DE4FEE84F}]
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	19c	AU	#############
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	19c	AU	AU setting next detection timeout to 2009-07-02 18:29:29
    2009-07-02	16:17:19:812	1280	19c	AU	Setting AU scheduled install time to 2009-07-03 02:00:00
    2009-07-02	16:17:24:812	1280	3cc	Report	REPORT EVENT: {63407DB7-FE61-4007-B9F6-6A3FE40C2ECC}	2009-07-02 16:17:19:812+0100	1	147	101	{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}	0	0	AutomaticUpdates	Success	Software Synchronization	Windows Update Client successfully detected 1 updates.
    2009-07-02	16:17:24:812	1280	3cc	Report	REPORT EVENT: {426EAD95-842F-488B-BF20-B5DFC9D24587}	2009-07-02 16:17:19:812+0100	1	156	101	{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}	0	0	AutomaticUpdates	Success	Pre-Deployment Check	Reporting client status.
    2009-07-02	16:20:20:921	1280	19c	AU	AU checked download status and it changed: Downloading is not paused
    2009-07-02	16:20:20:921	1280	19c	AU	AU setting pending client directive to 'Download Progress'
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:125	1280	808	AU	Launched new AU client for directive 'Download Progress', session id = 0x0
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:156	2596	b7c	Misc	===========  Logging initialized (build: 7.1.6001.65, tz: +0100)  ===========
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:156	2596	b7c	Misc	  = Process: C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuauclt.exe
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:156	2596	b7c	AUClnt	Launched Client UI process
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:234	2596	b7c	Misc	===========  Logging initialized (build: 7.1.6001.65, tz: +0100)  ===========
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:234	2596	b7c	Misc	  = Process: C:\WINDOWS\system32\wuauclt.exe
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:234	2596	b7c	Misc	  = Module: C:\WINDOWS\system32\wucltui.dll
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:234	2596	b7c	CltUI	AU client got new directive = 'Download Progress', serviceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, return = 0x00000000
    2009-07-02	16:20:36:234	2596	b7c	CltUI	AU client creating default WU/WSUS UI plugin
    2009-07-02	16:21:00:109	1280	308	DnldMgr	BITS job {05A0AF1A-6874-48D6-9EF0-376C060212E0} completed successfully
    2009-07-02	16:21:00:265	1280	308	Misc	Validating signature for C:\WINDOWS\SoftwareDistribution\Download\d1aa06bf58f925ef0f147aef76702fc7\eef5a36924cdf0c02598ccf96aa4f60887a49840:
    2009-07-02	16:21:00:406	1280	308	Misc	 Microsoft signed: Yes
    2009-07-02	16:21:00:468	1280	308	DnldMgr	  Download job bytes total = 24758792, bytes transferred = 24758792
    2009-07-02	16:21:00:515	1280	308	DnldMgr	***********  DnldMgr: New download job [UpdateId = {B746CE49-8054-4E6E-865A-DB442BE9952A}.103]  ***********
    2009-07-02	16:21:00:953	1280	308	DnldMgr	  * All files for update were already downloaded and are valid.
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:046	1280	19c	AU	>>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Download update [UpdateId = {5D2787CB-BCB5-439D-B734-3E6F1B21B2DD}, succeeded]
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:046	1280	19c	AU	#########
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:046	1280	19c	AU	##  END  ##  AU: Download updates
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:046	1280	19c	AU	#############
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:046	1280	19c	AU	Setting AU scheduled install time to 2009-07-03 02:00:00
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:046	1280	19c	AU	AU setting pending client directive to 'Install Approval'
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:046	1280	19c	AU	Changing existing AU client directive from 'Download Progress' to 'Install Approval', session id = 0x0
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:093	2596	b7c	CltUI	AU client got new directive = 'Install Approval', serviceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, return = 0x00000000
    2009-07-02	16:21:01:093	2596	b7c	CltUI	AU client creating default WU/WSUS UI plugin
    2009-07-02	16:21:06:046	1280	3cc	Report	REPORT EVENT: {2D208E1A-2F6E-42DB-8A33-5A5BC407C8A8}	2009-07-02 16:21:01:046+0100	1	188	102	{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}	0	0	AutomaticUpdates	Success	Content Install	Installation Ready: The following updates are downloaded and ready for installation. This computer is currently scheduled to install these updates on 03 July 2009 at 03:00:  - Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 1 (KB110806)
    2009-07-02	16:21:06:046	1280	3cc	Report	REPORT EVENT: {2413B716-AD4C-4412-82D2-CE383EA26F1F}	2009-07-02 16:21:01:046+0100	1	162	101	{5D2787CB-BCB5-439D-B734-3E6F1B21B2DD}	103	0	AutomaticUpdates	Success	Content Download	Download succeeded.
    2009-07-02	16:25:46:076	1280	3cc	Report	Uploading 19 events using cached cookie, reporting URL = http://camspemwsus1.cobwebmanage.local/ReportingWebService/ReportingWebService.asmx
    2009-07-02	16:25:46:107	1280	3cc	Report	Reporter successfully uploaded 19 events.
    
  • 2. července 2009 16:00Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    OK i will try that.

    None of the clients are reporting that they need the patches that have been released. They claim they are all up to date, and the new patches that were released in June are saying they are "Not Applicable". Even if they are not picking up the fact that the patches have been approved surely they should be saying that they need the patches?

    Not if, for some reason, they're not coming up in the WUA scan of the WSUS Server at all.
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 2. července 2009 16:02Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    WAU scan (windows automatic update scan?). Any way of checking this, or refreshing the status of the server?

    I'll try and remove the server from WSUS, delete the SoftwareDistribution directory and see if it picks it up. Would it be an issue client side or server side? Which one does the scan of the server?
  • 2. července 2009 16:05Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Odpovědět
    To me this shows that the server is working correctly for distributing patches that are already shown to be needed by clients, but it seems to be going wrong with clients reporting new patches that it needs.

    As noted above... the WUAgent can only report on what it can *see* at the server. If the new updates are "invisible" to the WUAgent during the update scan, then it cannot report any status for the update. Remember, everything happens from the WUAgent. The WSUS Server is just a passive player in this game, answering queries to a database of available updates, and providing binary packages for download when requested. But if those queries are returning defective information, then the WUAgent can't "Comment on" updates it doesn't know about.

    Thus my suggestion to completely UNAPPROVE (maybe even DECLINE), and then REAPPROVE those June updates -- the intent being to 'reset' anything that might have gotten incorrectly set by a dysfunctional approval the first time through (like inadvertently setting the Decline or Expire bitflag on the updates - which would cause exactly this behavior).


    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 2. července 2009 16:07Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    Of course, all of this theory is based on the presumption that the June updates really are NEEDED on those server(s), and that they are being misreported.

    Have you physically confirmed, at each server, that these updates have NOT been installed?
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 5. srpna 2009 7:41Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    As an update. It seems that some machines are reporting OK, and these are a mix of 2003 and 2008 machines.

    On a server that is not reporting correctly (the WSUS server) i ran the client diagnostic tool, and all checks passed with no issue.

    Any more ideas?
  • 5. srpna 2009 9:29Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     Odpovědět

    I seem to have found the issue. It seems that from the June 2009 updates released by Microsoft, there is no longer support for Server 2003 SP1. This is what the machines that are not reporting correctly are running. I installed SP2 on my WSUS server and immediately after rebooting it started reporting correctly.

    Thanks.

    • Označen jako odpověďKeir Nolan 13. srpna 2009 10:24
    •  
  • 6. srpna 2009 0:07Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    This is not likely the case Keir. I have a couple of systems in my network that are still at Win2003SP1 (just not motivated to take the time to install SP2).. and they're reporting just fine.

    What's more likely is that you've inadvertently supplied a "needed" update by applying SP2, and now the post-SP2 updates can be detected. A missing update that is a prerequisite for other updates would pretty much shutdown a client's activity if it missed being approved for installation.

    Or, as I suggested on July 2nd, it could be an update with a corrupted approval that's not being properly detected by those machines.


    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 6. srpna 2009 9:10Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    I've tried it on a few machines in my test lab, and as soon as i install SP2 then reboot, it starts to report that it needs multiple critical and security patches.

    If you look at the security bulletins for April it shows that the patches are for SP2 AND SP1.

    If you look at the security bulletins for June it shows that the patches are for SP2 only.

    I'm going to roll this out to my servers to resolve the issue.

    Thanks.
  • 6. srpna 2009 16:37Lawrence GarvinMVP, ModerátorUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    > I've tried it on a few machines in my test lab, and as soon as i install SP2 then reboot, it starts to report that it needs multiple critical and security patches.

    I've already addressed one common scenario that may be responsible for this behavior.

    But, in addition, you also need to be aware of this: Support for downlevel service packs is only available for 24 months after the release of the current service pack. Service Pack 2 was released on 3/13/2007, which means, functionally speaking, that general update support for Windows Server 2003 SP1 systems ended on 3/13/2009. Therefore, I do not find it suprising at all that updates may not be applicable to Win2003SP1 systems. In those scenarios, the correct resolution is to install Service Pack 2.

    > If you look at the security bulletins for April it shows that the patches are for SP2 AND SP1.

    > If you look at the security bulletins for June it shows that the patches are for SP2 only.

    Note that MS09-020 is applicable to IIS5.0 on Windows 2000 SP4 (which is in Extended Support, thus eligible for security updates) and IIS 5.1 on Windows XP SP2 (which is still supported until 4/21/2010); however Win2003SP1 is past it's supported lifecycle. As noted above, the supported lifecycle for service packs is two years after the release of the subsequent service pack. Win2003 Service Pack 2 was released on 3/13/2007, thus support for Service Pack 1 expired on 3/13/2009. So, I don't find it at all surprising that MS09-020 is only applicable to =SP2= systems. The correct remediation is (as always) to install the Latest Service Pack.

    However, none of this has anything at all to do with WSUS functionality, or your originally reported issue. Windows Server 2003 SP1 systems will continue to report, in perpetuity, to a WSUS Server. The fact that an update may be Not Applicable to the machine has absolutely nothing at all to do with whether it is properly reporting or not.

    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA
    Principal/CTO, Onsite Technology Solutions, Houston, Texas
    Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2009)
  • 13. srpna 2009 10:23Keir Nolan Uživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaileUživatelské medaile
     
    However, none of this has anything at all to do with WSUS functionality, or your originally reported issue. Windows Server 2003 SP1 systems will continue to report, in perpetuity, to a WSUS Server. The fact that an update may be Not Applicable to the machine has absolutely nothing at all to do with whether it is properly reporting or not.


    My original question was in regards to thinking that the servers were not reporting successfully. However, they were only reporting as "Not Applicable" because they had all the patches that Microsoft had released that was supported by SP1 installed on them. Once I had noticed this lack of support in new updates for SP1, the installation of SP2 resolved the issue.

    Turns out it was just my fault for being slack with installing Service Packs rather than any WSUS issue :)