none
MBAM 2.0 SP1 Reports Location changed

    Question

  • It appears that the 2.0 SP1 installer puts the Bitlocker reports into the default Reports container (using a SCCM 2012 integrated installation) instead of the MBAM folder.  And the category of the report shows the language abbreviation and not "MBAM" as that 2.0 installer did. 

    Is this expected, or a change to the way the reports install? 

    Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:07 PM

Answers

  • When MBAM is integrated with SCCM 2012, the compliance reporting then gets managed by SCCM instead of MBAM. So you are right. This behavior is expected. 

    Gaurav Ranjan

    Friday, January 10, 2014 10:01 AM