why those options not included at FCS

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:16:49 Z

i wonder if can i confute FCS to take action as
if detect Virus/spyware so First action to clean then delete/quarantine

i don't need manual interaction response when malware detected
i need FCS to automatically clean any Infected files
why user must right click and chick smart clean or apply Action

any AV have this option, did MS not trust itself and need client to take action or FCS are not good enough to know Malware from false positive
where is shell integration and why when we ask about any AV option MS say at FCS v2,
MS should make a hot fixes for this or it will lose market because customer will not wait until their environment be infected.

waiting ur answer badly

why those options not included at FCS

Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:36:44 Z

FCS to automatically clean any Infected files, it is good idea, but manual interaction response is integrant also.

------------------------------
microsoft antispyware

why those options not included at FCS

Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:41:57 Z

Hi!

Forefront Client Security immediately suspends the infected file (renders it harmless) then after 10 minutes (non configurable time) it automatically takes recommended action.

I know that this behavior confuses the user to belive they have to do something manually. This is not true. it's fully automatic.

I'm sorry i did not see this question until now...hopefully i have shed some light over this.

/Johan

MCSE, forefront spec | www.msforefront.com

why those options not included at FCS

Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:45:51 Z

Is it likely that the 10min timeframe will be configurable/adjustable in a future release of forefront?