Default Corporate Calendar Sharing Policy

Answered Default Corporate Calendar Sharing Policy

  • Monday, February 13, 2012 3:32 PM
     
     

    I was excited to see that Exchange 2010 has a 'Default Sharing Policy' but dismayed to find out that it only applies to Federated Domains.

    Our organization does not federate with other domains - however, we want to set a corporate default calendar policy to apply to all mailboxes.  We want everyone to have 'Reviewer' rights to everyone's calendar.  There are exceptions: 6 execs at the top of the food chain where we don't want anyone but their admins to have 'Reviwer' rights.

    What is the best way to accomplish this? I appreciate your help on this one.

    Thanks

All Replies

  • Monday, February 13, 2012 3:42 PM
     
     Answered
    I hope this help
    http://blog.powershell.no/2010/09/20/managing-calendar-permissions-in-exchange-server-2010/
    http://exchangeshare.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/faq-give-calendar-read-permission-on-all-mailboxes-pfdavadmin/
    You will use ExFolders as PFDaveAdmin is not supproted in 2010.

    Gulab Prasad,
    MCITP: Exchange Server 2010 | MCITP: Exchange Server 2007
    MCITP: Lync Server 2010 | MCITP: Windows Server 2008
    My Blog | Z-Hire Employee Provisioning App


  • Wednesday, February 15, 2012 6:07 AM
    Moderator
     
     

    Hi crunch70,

    Any updates?

    Seems like you just want to share the calendar inside organization, right?


    Frank Wang

    TechNet Community Support

  • Wednesday, February 15, 2012 2:17 PM
     
     

    I believe I may have been over complicating it - It seems, after some research, that the easiest way to make this change is to change the default user calendar permission from Free/Busy to Reviewer, rather than running a script against this.  Am I mistaken or is there a better way? 

    Thanks all!

  • Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:12 AM
    Moderator
     
     Answered

    Hi crunch70,

    Running the script is to bulk modify end user's calendar permission.

    Otherwise, you have to ask end users to modify the permission by themselves, or you have to modify the permission for them one by one.

    Please download and review the script and modify something to meet your needs(specially for the execs).


    Frank Wang

    TechNet Community Support

  • Monday, May 21, 2012 6:28 PM
     
     Proposed Answer

    Easier than scripts....  Do it in the GUI!  Granted, Microsoft's biggest failure as of late is to limiting the power of their admin guis, but they can still do some things efficiently.

    1. Go to Default sharing policy properties, mailboxes tab

    2. Select Add

    3. Select everyone or multiple users, or ctrl+A       [you can add more than one(or all) user(s) at a time.]

    4. Select OK

    Or if you want to exclude a few people, remove them after adding everyone, or de-select their names out of the list before adding.


    • Proposed As Answer by StevenTate Monday, May 21, 2012 6:29 PM
    • Edited by StevenTate Monday, May 21, 2012 6:31 PM
    •  
  • Friday, November 30, 2012 2:29 PM
     
     

    Easier than scripts....  Do it in the GUI!  Granted, Microsoft's biggest failure as of late is to limiting the power of their admin guis, but they can still do some things efficiently.

    1. Go to Default sharing policy properties, mailboxes tab

    2. Select Add

    3. Select everyone or multiple users, or ctrl+A       [you can add more than one(or all) user(s) at a time.]

    4. Select OK

    Or if you want to exclude a few people, remove them after adding everyone, or de-select their names out of the list before adding.


    to clarify, using the GUI from all I can find is ONLY for Federated domains. It has no effect on local user rights. (I tested this myself and saw no change, and in researching I discovered it doesnt apply locally)

  • Friday, December 07, 2012 5:30 PM
     
     

    Hey folks,

    Is there a way to set this as a default for new users that we add instead of having to go back and edit the settings later?

    Does this make sense?

    J