Ask a questionAsk a question
 

AnswerExchange 2007 DR Testing

  • Friday, October 30, 2009 12:07 AMSaravanan.T Users MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers Medals
     
    Hi forum members,

                         How are you all guys...I want a solution for one setup...Actually i am using Exchange 2007 with Mailbox role in one server and HUB/CAS Role in another server and having 2 DC's....I am using CA arcserve for exchange backup...I like to test AD and Exchange DR testing so i setup separate VLAN for testing and created like as a live environment (same host names of DC's,Exchange server, same domain name etc..). I successfully backup and restore primary DC system state date, and it become Primary DC in test setup. Then I installed Exchange 2007 server roles using RECOVERSERVER  switch and it is also installed successfully... After created this setup, when i try to restore exchange mbx db backup taken by arcserve, it is not directly restore backup db into original db. alternatively it create RSG and stores the mailbox content. When i try to merge the mbx to users it stops after 10 mins with successful message. but when i check eventvwr it shows

    Event ID 1008 Source:Exchange Migration
    The restore-mailbox task for mailbox 'mailbox' failed.
    Error: Failed to copy messages to the destination mailbox store with error: The operation was cancelled.

    so what i want to know is
    1.why this event happen and why merge operation stops after 10 mins? Is it natural to stop after 10 mins?
    2.when i merge  the user mails, all the mails are storing directly into inbox. so is there any way to store mail from separate folder into their corresponding folder for e.g. (backup)inbox-->(restoring)inbox,(backup)sent items-->(restoring)sent items...

    Please help very very urgent.....



                  

    Saravanan

Answers

  • Friday, October 30, 2009 5:54 AMRajnish R Sharma Users MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers Medals
     Answer
    Instead of running this from GUI , can you try this

    Restore-Mailbox -Identity <target mailbox> -RSGDatabase "<recovery storage group>\<recovery store>" -RSGMailbox <source mailbox> -targetfolder <target folder>

    and your answers are

    1. No, its not normal.

    2. Yes , this is possible. See the Shell command

    Restore all RSG content of mailbox testE12mbx1 to a folder called Backup inside the currently used testE12mbx2 mailbox:


    MSH> restore-mailbox -RSGMailbox 'testE12mbx1' -RSGDatabase 'Recovery Storage Group\Mailbox Database' -id 'testE12mbx2' -TargetFolder ‘Backup’


    Raj
  • Monday, November 02, 2009 3:29 AMJames-LuoMSFT, ModeratorUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers Medals
     Answer

    Per my knowledge, there’s a bug for merging/copying large mailboxes (2 GB plus) from RSG into live mailbox by using Exchange Disaster Recovery Analyzer Tool. And, the workaround has been provided by Rajnish

    It has been fixed in exchange 2007 SP2

All Replies

  • Friday, October 30, 2009 5:54 AMRajnish R Sharma Users MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers Medals
     Answer
    Instead of running this from GUI , can you try this

    Restore-Mailbox -Identity <target mailbox> -RSGDatabase "<recovery storage group>\<recovery store>" -RSGMailbox <source mailbox> -targetfolder <target folder>

    and your answers are

    1. No, its not normal.

    2. Yes , this is possible. See the Shell command

    Restore all RSG content of mailbox testE12mbx1 to a folder called Backup inside the currently used testE12mbx2 mailbox:


    MSH> restore-mailbox -RSGMailbox 'testE12mbx1' -RSGDatabase 'Recovery Storage Group\Mailbox Database' -id 'testE12mbx2' -TargetFolder ‘Backup’


    Raj
  • Monday, November 02, 2009 3:29 AMJames-LuoMSFT, ModeratorUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers MedalsUsers Medals
     Answer

    Per my knowledge, there’s a bug for merging/copying large mailboxes (2 GB plus) from RSG into live mailbox by using Exchange Disaster Recovery Analyzer Tool. And, the workaround has been provided by Rajnish

    It has been fixed in exchange 2007 SP2