FIM Schema - attributes vs. properties
-
Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:59 PM
I'm trying to map AD user attributes to FIM person attributes, just to get a sense of what is available when defining attribute flows.
Looking at the schema for FIM, here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee652538(v=vs.100).aspx
My question is what is the difference between what I see in the XML formated schema definition, for example: name="AccountName"
and what is defined on that page below the schema box, the list defined as 'Properties? (Where AccountName also happens to be defined, but then many of those listed seem unique and not defined within the schema).
Thanks!
All Replies
-
Wednesday, December 05, 2012 1:30 AM
Those are the same. The list and the XML have the same items.
As far as mapping those to AD. Accountname would map to samaccountname.
firstname to givenname
lastname to sn
Check out the above link for an example
David Lundell, Get your copy of FIM Best Practices Volume 1 http://blog.ilmbestpractices.com/2010/08/book-is-here-fim-best-practices-volume.html
-
Wednesday, December 05, 2012 4:14 AM
Thanks for your reply David - Conceptually, as long as they are 'supposed' to be the same I'm good. I noticed there are several attributes listed (ObjectID, displayName, DetectedRulesList, etc) in the schema that are not defined in the list and wanted to make sure I was not missing something in terms of versions or usage.
- Edited by Osho27 Wednesday, December 05, 2012 4:17 AM
-
Wednesday, December 05, 2012 6:22 AM
Those items are from the Resource schema and all object classes "inherit" them (it is the only example of inheritance in the FIM Schema).
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee652451(v=vs.100).aspx
David Lundell, Get your copy of FIM Best Practices Volume 1 http://blog.ilmbestpractices.com/2010/08/book-is-here-fim-best-practices-volume.html

