Answered Hardware configuration

  • Monday, May 14, 2012 9:13 AM
     
     

    We have an ongoing virtualization project and I have started using the Server Consolidation wizard in MAP 6.5

    First of all(after inventory and performance collection) I tried the 'Sample host' configuration in the Server consolidation wizard to generate the summary report.

    If I create a new hardware configuration with same parameters as the 'Sample host', run the consolidation wizard again, the summary report is showing completely different numbers, especially for CPU.

    Is this a bug or am I missing something here?

    Best regards

    GH

All Replies

  • Monday, May 14, 2012 7:55 PM
    Moderator
     
     
    I'm not able to reproduce this. I used the sample database that is available in the MAP training kit. I created a Server Virtualization Recommendation report using the sample host hardware configuration. Then I created a new configuration in the hardware library with the exact same specs as the sample and re-ran the Server Consolidation Wizard with the new duplicated hardware profile. I'm getting exactly the same results. Do you have a screen shot or samples to show what you are seeing?

    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Tuesday, May 15, 2012 5:45 AM
     
     Answered

    Been investigating a bit more.

    It also happens when I use the same hardware profile but tick the "edit hardware" before I proceed. Then the cpu frequency becomes 3,600 instead of 3.6.

    It looks like the thing here is formatting of numbers. I am using a Norwegian(Bokmal) date and time format.

    If I switch to English(United states) everything is much better. I consider it a bug but will use the English date and time format for now to generate the reports.

     

    • Marked As Answer by gautehan Friday, May 18, 2012 6:11 AM
    •  
  • Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:22 AM
    Moderator
     
     

    I would like to investigate this further in our test lab. What is the UI Culture and Culture as reported in the MAP log? (C:\Program Files\Microsoft Assessment and Planning Toolkit\bin\log)

    For example, mine looks like this:

    |========================================
    |
    |Logging started at 01/10/2012 10:00:36
    |    Application:     Microsoft.AssessmentPlatform.UI.Console.exe Build 6.5.4226.0 retail
    |    Platform:        Win32NT 6.1.7601.65536 Service Pack 1
    |    UI Culture:      en-US
    |    Culture:         en-US
    |    Architecture:    64-bit
    |    OS Product Name: Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise
    |
    |========================================


    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:26 AM
     
     

    Mine is:

       |========================================
       |
       |Logging started at 05/16/2012 09:23:34
       |    Application:     Microsoft.AssessmentPlatform.UI.Console.exe Build 6.5.4229.0 retail
       |    Platform:        Win32NT 6.1.7601.65536 Service Pack 1
       |    UI Culture:      en-US
       |    Culture:         nb-NO
       |    Architecture:    64-bit
       |    OS Product Name: Microsoft Windows 7 Professional
       |
       |========================================

  • Friday, May 18, 2012 12:34 AM
    Moderator
     
     Answered
    You are right, it is a bug. I was able to reproduce it on a machine running a German installation of Windows. I have filed a bug on this issue, thanks for bringing this to our attention.

    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.