Sign in
 
HomeSharePoint Server 2010SharePoint Foundation 2010SharePoint OnlineLibraryForums
SharePoint Products > SharePoint 2010 Forums > SharePoint 2010 - Setup, Upgrade, Administration and Operation > Review Job Definitions in CA -> Operation is not valid due to the current state of the operation

Answered Review Job Definitions in CA -> Operation is not valid due to the current state of the operation

    •  
      Friday, January 07, 2011 7:07 AM
       
       
      Sign In to Vote
      0
      Sign In to Vote

      Hi,

      In a newly installed Sharepoint 2010 farm, I try to open Monitoring -> Review Job Definition in CA.

      I get the following error "Operation is not valid due to the current state of the object".

      This resolution did not work:
      http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepoint2010setup/thread/7c5b735f-9ec7-4d58-9c02-4180b57b1928

      From the ULS:

      System.InvalidOperationException: Operation is not valid due to the current state of the object.   
      at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationJob.get_UserProfileApplication()    
      at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationJob.get_DisplayName()     at
      (...)

      The User Profile Service (UPS) worked correctly and did synchronize profiles from the AD.

      Due to this error I deleted the UPS, but still the same error.  

      Then I successfully reinstalled UPS with new databases. Still same error.

      Anyone have an idea to resolve this?

      Best regards
      Roar Kristiansen,
      Skill AS

       

    Answers

    All Replies

    • Friday, January 07, 2011 3:36 PM
       
       
      Sign In to Vote
      1
      Sign In to Vote

      I would delete the User Profile Service Application and try accessing it again (do not create a new one yet). If this works then provision a new one but this time call it a different name to the last time around, so if you called it "UPA1" the first time call it "UPA2". Try it again. Also make sure that the UPA account is a local administrator for the configuration etc.

      Also as a check make the timer service account have specific permission to the UPA databases.

      Just a couple of things to try.

      Thanks

      Liam

       
    • Sunday, January 09, 2011 1:34 PM
       
       
      Sign In to Vote
      0
      Sign In to Vote

      I would delete the User Profile Service Application and try accessing it again (do not create a new one yet). If this works then provision a new one but this time call it a different name to the last time around, so if you called it "UPA1" the first time call it "UPA2". Try it again. Also make sure that the UPA account is a local administrator for the configuration etc.

      Also as a check make the timer service account have specific permission to the UPA databases.

      Just a couple of things to try.

      Thanks

      Liam

      Thanks for your suggestions, I've already tried this, and I could not access the Job definitions after deleteing the UPA. The service account has full access to both databases and UPA.

      Regards
      Roar

       
    • Thursday, January 27, 2011 2:28 PM
       
       
      Sign In to Vote
      0
      Sign In to Vote

      I have exactly the same problem which was caused by installing a language pack. I've tried rolling back but no luck.

      I've also applied the latest December CU to no avail.

       
    • Tuesday, February 01, 2011 6:40 AM
       
       
      Sign In to Vote
      0
      Sign In to Vote
      I also have this problem on December CU and have re-created the user profile application without luck.  If you find a solution, please post.  Occurred to me immediately following a database attach upgrade from 2007.
       
    • Tuesday, February 01, 2011 3:16 PM
       
       Answered
      Sign In to Vote
      2
      Sign In to Vote

      I have fixed mine with instructions from http://blog.schauweb.dk/post/2010/12/01/User-Profile-Service.aspx.  There were invalid jobs setup from a previous attempt at provisioning the UPS that needed to be removed.

       
    • Tuesday, February 01, 2011 3:26 PM
       
       
      Sign In to Vote
      0
      Sign In to Vote

      Thank you for sharing! Since my server was new, I did a re-install...

      Regards
      Roar