Content Deployment ProblemsHello -<br>I am having an ongoing problem with content deployments on MOSS 2007 SP1 that I'm hoping someone here can shed some light on. <br>The GUI is problematic, so I use stsadm. I created the job in the GUI, and then I run them as:<br>stsadm -o runcontentdeploymentjob -jobname &quot;ChangesOnly&quot;<br><br>We have been having intermittent problems with CD for months, so last week I patched all of our Sharepoint environments. They were already SP1. I applied 3 hotifxes: 946517, 95268, and 952704 without issue. I ran the Sharepoint configuration wizard after the last two (as instructed) without a problem.<br><br>We have an 8GB content database.<br>Our 1-tier development and 2-tier staging environments are behind our firewall. Content deployments between these two environments, in both directions, run flawlessly using the same content that deploys from staging to production.<br>Our 2-tier production environment is set up with the sql server behind the firewall, and the web server in the DMZ. CD from staging to production is the problem.<br>Both prod servers have 4GB of RAM allocated to them. If it is of note, the are both VM (VMWare), as are the dev and staging environments.<br><br>The CD job runs and the changes go through, but takes forever and brings down the website. Example: I started the job last night at 8:15pm. It was still running when I went to bed last night. The website went up and down a few times overnight (monitoring via siteuptime.com), from a 2 minute outage to a 40 minute outage. Finally, around 7am, after an extended outage, I had to reboot both servers becuase SQL server was pegged at 99% usage.<br>Rebooting usually fixes the problem. Note that siteuptime is quite accurate - nights that I don't run the CD job, there are no outages.<br><br>Earlier this week I did a stadm export from staging, manually copied the files to the production web server, and ran the import via stsadm on the production web server instead of a content deployment with similar results.<br><br>I also disable the anti-virus during the import and/or CD processes to rule that out.<br><br>I have deleted and re-created the CD jobs and paths many times - makes no difference.<br><br>This is a problem because this is our public website, and we can't afford for it to be down. Running the CD overnight is really just a stop-gap solution, as overnight outages are better the ones during the business day. (We are not a 24-hour operation.)<br><br>I guess I could schedule a reboot around 5am every morning, but that's not fixing the issue at hand.<br><br>The following ports have been verified as open on our firewall:<br>TCP 1433 SQL<br>TCP/UDP 53<br>TCP 80/443<br>TCP/UDP 445<br>TCP/UDP 88<br>LDAP/LDAPS 389/636<br><br>I suppose if the ports weren't open it wouldn't work at all. The changes do go through eventually.<br><br>We don't have any custom features or anything custom, really, other than masterpages and css. It's pretty close to an out-of-box solution, just a little prettier. <img height=19 alt=Smile src="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" width=19><br><br>We've had this set up for 18 months. It's only in the past 2-3 months that CD has become problematic, and in the past few weeks that it's become the way I describe above. I suppose that could be due to database size, but it's not all that much bigger than it was 6 months ago.<br><br>Any ideas are welcome. I know CD has been problematic for many, but it is working for me in my dev and staging environments. I realize that may mean it's a firewall issue - but what, exactly? I need to go in armed with the right questions, otherwise I'm told &quot;It's not the firewall.&quot; So if anyone can provide me with good, detailed things to check, it would be much appreciated. And please write it out like I'm 5 - I'm just a developer who has been thrown into trying to figure out network/firewall issues.<br><br>Much Obliged.<br><br>--Sandy<br>© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:07:48 Zc047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1chttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1c#c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1chttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1c#c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1csandy_lamoureux_miltoncat.comhttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=sandy_lamoureux_miltoncat.comContent Deployment ProblemsHello -<br>I am having an ongoing problem with content deployments on MOSS 2007 SP1 that I'm hoping someone here can shed some light on. <br>The GUI is problematic, so I use stsadm. I created the job in the GUI, and then I run them as:<br>stsadm -o runcontentdeploymentjob -jobname &quot;ChangesOnly&quot;<br><br>We have been having intermittent problems with CD for months, so last week I patched all of our Sharepoint environments. They were already SP1. I applied 3 hotifxes: 946517, 95268, and 952704 without issue. I ran the Sharepoint configuration wizard after the last two (as instructed) without a problem.<br><br>We have an 8GB content database.<br>Our 1-tier development and 2-tier staging environments are behind our firewall. Content deployments between these two environments, in both directions, run flawlessly using the same content that deploys from staging to production.<br>Our 2-tier production environment is set up with the sql server behind the firewall, and the web server in the DMZ. CD from staging to production is the problem.<br>Both prod servers have 4GB of RAM allocated to them. If it is of note, the are both VM (VMWare), as are the dev and staging environments.<br><br>The CD job runs and the changes go through, but takes forever and brings down the website. Example: I started the job last night at 8:15pm. It was still running when I went to bed last night. The website went up and down a few times overnight (monitoring via siteuptime.com), from a 2 minute outage to a 40 minute outage. Finally, around 7am, after an extended outage, I had to reboot both servers becuase SQL server was pegged at 99% usage.<br>Rebooting usually fixes the problem. Note that siteuptime is quite accurate - nights that I don't run the CD job, there are no outages.<br><br>Earlier this week I did a stadm export from staging, manually copied the files to the production web server, and ran the import via stsadm on the production web server instead of a content deployment with similar results.<br><br>I also disable the anti-virus during the import and/or CD processes to rule that out.<br><br>I have deleted and re-created the CD jobs and paths many times - makes no difference.<br><br>This is a problem because this is our public website, and we can't afford for it to be down. Running the CD overnight is really just a stop-gap solution, as overnight outages are better the ones during the business day. (We are not a 24-hour operation.)<br><br>I guess I could schedule a reboot around 5am every morning, but that's not fixing the issue at hand.<br><br>The following ports have been verified as open on our firewall:<br>TCP 1433 SQL<br>TCP/UDP 53<br>TCP 80/443<br>TCP/UDP 445<br>TCP/UDP 88<br>LDAP/LDAPS 389/636<br><br>I suppose if the ports weren't open it wouldn't work at all. The changes do go through eventually.<br><br>We don't have any custom features or anything custom, really, other than masterpages and css. It's pretty close to an out-of-box solution, just a little prettier. <img height=19 alt=Smile src="http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/emoticons/emotion-1.gif" width=19><br><br>We've had this set up for 18 months. It's only in the past 2-3 months that CD has become problematic, and in the past few weeks that it's become the way I describe above. I suppose that could be due to database size, but it's not all that much bigger than it was 6 months ago.<br><br>Any ideas are welcome. I know CD has been problematic for many, but it is working for me in my dev and staging environments. I realize that may mean it's a firewall issue - but what, exactly? I need to go in armed with the right questions, otherwise I'm told &quot;It's not the firewall.&quot; So if anyone can provide me with good, detailed things to check, it would be much appreciated. And please write it out like I'm 5 - I'm just a developer who has been thrown into trying to figure out network/firewall issues.<br><br>Much Obliged.<br><br>--Sandy<br>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:11:19 Z2008-06-24T12:40:31Zhttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1c#5e4040ca-b663-4ce4-9676-9828d2f8b44ehttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1c#5e4040ca-b663-4ce4-9676-9828d2f8b44esandy_lamoureux_miltoncat.comhttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=sandy_lamoureux_miltoncat.comContent Deployment ProblemsWell, for anyone interested...<br>I finally had enough. Our website wouldn't come up after multiple reboots yesterday morning, so we pulled both VMs behind the firewall and tried content deployments, as well as import/export. Not much luck there. But I noticed my content database had grown from 8GB 2 weeks ago to 20GB yesterday! I assume this had to do with the failed/timed out content deployments. So, after trying a few things it came down to this:<br><br>1. Delete the entire web application on production.<br>2. Create new web application on production with new blank template.<br>3. On staging, delete exisitng content deployment jobs and create a new full content deployment job to production.<br>4. Run full deployment to production.<br>5. Move web server back out into DMZ.<br><br>This worked, and now my production content database is around 600MB. (Oddly, my staging content database is 4GB, so I may have some repair to do there as well.)<br><br>Note that deleting the web app was not easy. It put the content database into single-user mode, and I had to delete it manually.<br><br>I have not yet tested the deployments through the firewall as I'd like to have some solid uptime before I possibly bring down the servers again. But I think I've found the issue, and at least the database size is under control.<br><br>I hope this helps save someone so time and frustration in the future.<br><br>If anyone has any ideas on preventing the ever-expanding database in the future, I'm all ears.<br><br>--Sandy<br><br><br>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:38:28 Z2008-06-24T12:40:31Zhttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1c#72032c85-f797-4550-bc05-59aa50905f55http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/c047352e-80ad-4bc0-a899-0fa649c46d1c#72032c85-f797-4550-bc05-59aa50905f55kukehttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/Profile/en-US/?user=kukeContent Deployment Problems<p align=left><font face=Arial size=2></font> </p> <p>Hi Sandy,</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>It's worrying that the new Content Deployment QFE's [http://www.andrewconnell.com/blog/archive/2008/07/01/KBs-are-now-out-for-the-two-content-migrationdeployment-QFEs.aspx] you've applied haven't solved the issue - I was kind of hoping they would.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>We too have this ever-expanding database issue - previously we thought it was:</p> <ul> <li> <div align=left>The recovery model of SQL and log files - so we set it to simple with no luck</div> <li> <div align=left>Versioning on the production side - so I wrote a tool to enumerate all sites/lists and disable versioning with no luck</div> <li> <div align=left>The fact that CD creates a lot of unused space in the DB - so we scheduled regular SHRINK commands with no luck</div></li></ul> <p align=left>The only other real discussion I've found on this issue was here: <a title="http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/aspnet/30906343/full-deployment-of-conten.aspx" href="http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/aspnet/30906343/full-deployment-of-conten.aspx">http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/aspnet/30906343/full-deployment-of-conten.aspx</a>, states that the problem is Full Deployments that don't actually clean themselves up and so you're only supposed to do a Full Deployment <strong>once</strong>. (We we've been running full deployments nightly as the incrementals were failing occassionally). So the question is, if you're only supposed to run a Full Deployment once - why can schedule them?!?</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>I too would love any update on this issue.</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Just when you think you've resolved all your CD problems - you find new ones!</p> <p> </p> <p>Cheers,</p> <p align=left> </p> <p align=left>Peter</p>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:28:19 Z2008-07-16T00:28:19Z