Answered by:
Licencing App-v without Terminal Services and MDOP

Question
-
Hi,
Can any one tell me for definate what the licence options for App-V running locally on the windows desktop (NOT on TS) please? I have been told that:
- It can only be licenced with an MDOP subscription / desktop / year
- It can now (as of Sept 2010) be licenced directly / desktop (one off payment) OR as a subscription / desktop / year
- That MDOP can only be purchased if you have Software Assurance (SA) on your desktop
- That MDOP can be puchased without SA for your desktop.
There is absolutely nothing I can find on the Microsoft website. I find it hard to believe that an existing customer with windows desktops and no SA would be expected to re-puchase there desktops with SA, and then buy MDOP just to get a app-v CAL!!! (though it is not beyond the relms of possibility....)
Any definitive help on this would be REALLY appriciated!!
Regards
Andrew
Friday, September 17, 2010 1:29 PM
Answers
-
These pages should answer your licensing questions and they don't look to have changed recently:
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/mdop.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/faq.aspx#faq_4
Also note that MDOP includes more than App-V:
- Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
- Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V)
- Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management (AGMP)
- Microsoft Asset Inventory Service (AIS)
- Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset (DaRT)
- Microsoft System Center Desktop Error Monitoring (DEM)
So it would be worth understanding the full value of SA/MDOP (I realise that's no comfort if all you want is App-V for Desktops).
- Proposed as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Friday, September 17, 2010 3:24 PM
- Marked as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Monday, September 20, 2010 12:35 PM
Friday, September 17, 2010 2:03 PMModerator -
Hi Aaron,
I have nw contacted Microsoft licencing (in parallel with this thread), and, indeed you must re-licence your OS, but SA and the by MDOP in order to run App-V.
Having looked at the costs, I think it's game over I'm afraid. I have a sneaking suspission that an over-enthusiastic product/licencing manager may have been involved in this excessive "licence chaining" that Microsoft (and others) apear to love so much.
Thanks for your help
Regards
Andrew
- Marked as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Monday, September 20, 2010 12:35 PM
Monday, September 20, 2010 7:18 AM
All replies
-
This article should give you links to the right information: http://blog.stealthpuppy.com/deployment/app-v-faq-3-how-is-app-v-licensed
If not, please let me know.
- Proposed as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Friday, September 17, 2010 3:24 PM
Friday, September 17, 2010 1:36 PMModerator -
Hi,
Thanks for the quick turn around. No - I still need confirmation (the article is July 2010) as to whether or not the App-V CAL can be brough separately as of Sept 2010????
Also, How does Microsoft address the licencing of App-V for customers who have existing desktops without SA? Are they effectively saying dont use App-V, or, if you want to use it then please completely re-licence with SA and MDOP????? I find this hard to believe....???
Regards
Andrew
Friday, September 17, 2010 1:48 PM -
Thanks for the quick turn around. No - I still need confirmation (the article is July 2010) as to whether or not the App-V CAL can be brough separately as of Sept 2010????
I'm not aware of any recent licensing changes. The App-V or MDOP blogs haven't posted anything to that effect.
Friday, September 17, 2010 1:56 PMModerator -
These pages should answer your licensing questions and they don't look to have changed recently:
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/mdop.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/software-assurance/faq.aspx#faq_4
Also note that MDOP includes more than App-V:
- Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V)
- Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization (MED-V)
- Microsoft Advanced Group Policy Management (AGMP)
- Microsoft Asset Inventory Service (AIS)
- Microsoft Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset (DaRT)
- Microsoft System Center Desktop Error Monitoring (DEM)
So it would be worth understanding the full value of SA/MDOP (I realise that's no comfort if all you want is App-V for Desktops).
- Proposed as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Friday, September 17, 2010 3:24 PM
- Marked as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Monday, September 20, 2010 12:35 PM
Friday, September 17, 2010 2:03 PMModerator -
Hi Aaron,
So how do I licence my existing no-SA desktops for app-v (short of re-licencing them all with SA and MDOP)?
Regards
Andrew
Friday, September 17, 2010 2:54 PM -
Hello,
You would need to have SA and MDOP for those desktops aswell....
/Znack
- Proposed as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Friday, September 17, 2010 3:24 PM
Friday, September 17, 2010 3:04 PM -
lol - Citrix here I come. A classic example of driving away your customers with poor licencing. - oh well.....Friday, September 17, 2010 3:13 PM
-
If you have a Microsoft account manager, you should clarify licensing with them. I would also recommend letting them know that you would like to by App-V for desktops without SA. The more people that do, the more likely Microsoft is to consider changing the licensing requirements.Friday, September 17, 2010 3:19 PMModerator
-
Hello,
I would LOVE to find a customer that has started using and kept on using CTX Streaming. (never seems to happen)Anychance you are located in Sweden?
/ZnackFriday, September 17, 2010 10:15 PM -
Hi Aaron,
I have nw contacted Microsoft licencing (in parallel with this thread), and, indeed you must re-licence your OS, but SA and the by MDOP in order to run App-V.
Having looked at the costs, I think it's game over I'm afraid. I have a sneaking suspission that an over-enthusiastic product/licencing manager may have been involved in this excessive "licence chaining" that Microsoft (and others) apear to love so much.
Thanks for your help
Regards
Andrew
- Marked as answer by Aaron.ParkerModerator Monday, September 20, 2010 12:35 PM
Monday, September 20, 2010 7:18 AM -
Hi Znack,
Sorry - we are in the UK, and it does not look like we are going to deploy App-V technology anyway.
Regards
Andrew
Monday, September 20, 2010 7:19 AM