Answered by:
Auto-Attendant and Subscriber Access Presence Offline

Question
-
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone else had exprienced this and if there is something i am missing.
The issue is that the Auto-Attendant, Subscriber Access and Conferencing Attendant all have presence of Offline.
They all work great, it's just the prensence!
Any ideas welcome.
Thanks again,
Alex.Monday, March 15, 2010 12:14 PM
Answers
-
It is by design, they are just contact objects that do not participate in Presence sharing.
Jeff Schertz, PointBridge | MVP | MCITP: Enterprise Messaging | MCTS: OCS- Marked as answer by Alex_Harvey Sunday, March 21, 2010 1:06 PM
Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:08 PM
All replies
-
Hi Alex,
I can just confirm I have the same situation.
My Exchange UM integration works fine but both the AD contact objects (Auto-Attendant and Subscriber Access) shows the presence as Offline.
/mkTuesday, March 16, 2010 11:48 AM -
I can also confirm this on the conferencing attendant and the UM contact objects. So i guess this is by design.
// Tommy Clarke - Blog: http://www.cinline.se/ - Twitter: http://twitter.com/itommyclarkeThursday, March 18, 2010 7:43 PM -
It is by design, they are just contact objects that do not participate in Presence sharing.
Jeff Schertz, PointBridge | MVP | MCITP: Enterprise Messaging | MCTS: OCS- Marked as answer by Alex_Harvey Sunday, March 21, 2010 1:06 PM
Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:08 PM -
Great, thanks for clearing that up Jeff.
Alex.
Sunday, March 21, 2010 1:07 PM -
Hi ,
Can you please help as my auto attendant and subscriber access is not working .
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchange Unified Messaging
Date: 1/20/2011 12:45:43 PM
Event ID: 1004
Task Category: UMCore
Level: Information
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: Description:
A call was received with the following parameters:
Calling Party: "sip:umtest@test.com",
Called Party: "sip:+14185490051@test;user=phone",
Diversion Information: "",Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:50 PM