No announcements
Found 1603433 threads
-
0 VotesEx 2007 SCC with SCR standalone target - issues failing back
SCR is designed for failing over an entire server.Answered | 9 Replies | 5892 Views | Created by -Mike - Tuesday, May 18, 2010 5:06 PM | Last reply by -Mike - Tuesday, May 25, 2010 2:16 PM
-
0 Votes
SCR with a SCC source
> to >> standalone Srvr since the CMS name is "Mailboxserver" how can i restore that name to a standalone srvr !!?Answered | 3 Replies | 4378 Views | Created by mwahab - Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:58 PM | Last reply by mwahab - Tuesday, August 9, 2011 8:46 AM -
0 Votes
Backing up SCR target
I'm not sure if this is valid for SCR targets?Answered | 10 Replies | 4178 Views | Created by Pancamo - Monday, April 18, 2011 7:01 PM | Last reply by Ed Crowley - Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:27 PM -
0 Votes
SCR setup with multiple SCC sources
Just to add, currently we are using a standalone mailbox servers as target for SCC clusters and will be using Database Portabaility for recovery.Answered | 8 Replies | 4868 Views | Created by v-beta - Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:48 AM | Last reply by v-beta - Wednesday, September 30, 2009 6:59 AM -
0 Votes
Adding SCR with SCC
If a Mailbox server in an SCC or CCR environment is used as the SCR source, the Enterprise Edition of Exchange 2007 SP1 is required because Enterprise ...Answered | 5 Replies | 3426 Views | Created by Hd.Hard - Wednesday, November 16, 2011 8:24 AM | Last reply by Hd.Hard - Sunday, November 20, 2011 11:27 AM -
0 Votes
Enable Ex 2007 SCR between Windows 2008 and Windows 2003
Doesn't look like you can mix OS versions across source and target for SCR.Answered | 1 Replies | 4848 Views | Created by Manjula Fernando - Friday, October 15, 2010 6:03 AM | Last reply by TWHarrington - Friday, October 15, 2010 1:03 PM -
0 Votes
SCR help.
what about fall back it the source server is online?Answered | 12 Replies | 5236 Views | Created by SGryzbowski - Tuesday, February 1, 2011 3:26 PM | Last reply by Anil K Singh - Saturday, February 5, 2011 4:34 AM -
0 Votes
Failing Over to Target SCR Server
Hi, We recommend create lab to test SCR failover as Ed mentioned.Answered | 2 Replies | 812 Views | Created by m24545 - Tuesday, June 23, 2015 4:11 AM | Last reply by Allen_WangJF - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 8:52 AM -
1 Votes
What are the diffrences between (CCR,SCR,LCR and SCC ) in Exchange server 2007 ?
I also wrote an article that covers the basics of the Exchange 2007 high availability features at the link below.Answered | 3 Replies | 19659 Views | Created by VenkatRamana.ambati - Friday, October 2, 2009 11:55 AM | Last reply by Neil Hobson [MSFT] - Monday, October 5, 2009 8:07 AM -
0 Votes
How many nodes can be install in (SCR ,SCC,LCR,CCR) on Exchange server 2007 ?
Hi , how can i understand wheather it is CCR ,SCC,SCR and LCR types are configured on runing Exchange ...Answered | 2 Replies | 6474 Views | Created by VenkatRamana.ambati - Tuesday, October 6, 2009 11:19 AM | Last reply by VenkatRamana.ambati - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:37 AM -
0 Votes
Planning for SCR test
A failover to an SCR target is a rather complicated process, not one that I'm in a position to design for you here, sorry.Answered | 2 Replies | 4113 Views | Created by Neil4933 - Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:56 AM | Last reply by Alan.Gim - Tuesday, April 5, 2011 7:23 AM -
0 Votes
Move Logfile Exchange 2007 ( SCR ) from EX-Server A ( Volume G : ) to EX-Server B ( Volume H: )
Afree with Michael, It's a prerequisite of SCR.Answered | 2 Replies | 3889 Views | Created by mueller3007 - Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:56 AM | Last reply by Gulab Prasad - Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:19 PM -
0 Votes
Exchange 2007 SCR
All SCR targets need to either single node clusters with the passive mailbox role installed, or a non clustered server with the mailbox role installed.Answered | 3 Replies | 5214 Views | Created by JasonMM - Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:11 PM | Last reply by VenkatExchange - Sunday, May 31, 2009 3:01 AM -
0 Votes
High Availabillity Cluster, SCC or CCR
I would choose SCR over third party replication technology because SCR is covered under Microsoft support umbrella, it is Exchange aware replication for site resilience and log ...Answered | 11 Replies | 5478 Views | Created by Brian Welch - Francis Howell - Friday, May 15, 2009 4:27 PM | Last reply by Amit Tank - Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:12 PM -
0 Votes
Exchange 2007 CCR and SCR
By just bringing this server online with the HUB\CAS roles installed, do you see any issues for my production environment.Answered | 4 Replies | 4634 Views | Created by gredden - Monday, February 1, 2010 7:14 PM | Last reply by gredden - Friday, February 5, 2010 4:11 AM -
0 Votes
Seeding and Exchange 2007 database to a SCR target over a WAN.
You have to execute the Update-StorageGroupCopy command on the SCR target and not on the SCR source.Answered | 3 Replies | 7017 Views | Created by mmonocchi - Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:53 PM | Last reply by Alan.Gim - Friday, March 20, 2009 9:43 AM -
0 Votes
SCR Target Configuration
Hey ibenna, As you are aware, the SCR target is not part of the CCR cluster in your primary site.Answered | 8 Replies | 4779 Views | Created by ibenna - Friday, April 17, 2009 3:51 PM | Last reply by jader3rd - Sunday, April 19, 2009 7:06 AM -
0 Votes
CCR or SCR?
It is possible to have SCR replication to a windows cluster, with all passive Exchange nodes.Answered | 4 Replies | 4449 Views | Created by Vic Sabljic - Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:58 PM | Last reply by Vic Sabljic - Thursday, October 29, 2009 4:27 PM -
1 Votes
Exchange 2007 CCr + SCR
This way, you have a target environment that doesn't affect the rest of your organization.Answered | 3 Replies | 1505 Views | Created by R Udeg - Monday, August 31, 2015 12:08 PM | Last reply by Will Martin, PFE - Monday, August 31, 2015 6:36 PM -
0 Votes
SCC/Disaster Recovery
Seems like quorum won't be an issue, since the MB server at DR is standalone.Answered | 6 Replies | 4645 Views | Created by -roc- - Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:21 PM | Last reply by Scott Feltmann - Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:44 PM - Items 1 to 20 of 1603433 Next ›
No announcements
