While performing a routine check of the logs of the machine hosting the SharePoint Server 2010 farm Central Administration, I saw the following error in the machine's System log:
Log Name: System Source: Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM Date: [Date/time]Event ID: 10016 Task Category: None Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: [DOMAIN\ServiceAccount]Computer: [computerName]Description: The application-specific permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM Server application with CLSID {61738644-F196-11D0-9953-00C04FD919C1} and APPID {61738644-F196-11D0-9953-00C04FD919C1} to the user [DOMAIN\ServiceAccount]SID (S-1-5-21-3888717925-1584238209-2724737031-1111) from address LocalHost (Using LRPC). This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool...
I found that resolving this problem involved the following SharePoint Server 2010 and Windows Server 2008 R2 components:
I confirm StJobe's post: I had to changed permission for HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AppID\{61738644-F196-11D0-9953-00C04FD919C1} also.
I had a bit of bother trying to get this to work (SP 2010 on Win Server 2008 R2).
Not until I went to Wictor Wilén's blog (linked under References above) and changed permission for HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AppID\{61738644-F196-11D0-9953-00C04FD919C1} did I manage to change the Launch and Activation Permissions for IIS WAMREG admin Service.
After I had changed that key (in addition to the other ones listed) it worked perfectly.
For folks still having problems - restart the COM+ Event System and COM+ System Application services, and be sure to launch the Component Services applet as administrator. That's how I finally got access to the security settings.
Hi, thanks for this. I'm having this issue on a windows 2012 server running SP2013. Despite making the security changes, the Security tab settings in component manager and the General/authentication areas are still greyed out/disabled. Also as your notes say I found only the first 3 keys needed to be changed, the rest then reflected the same changes (I assume there is some linking in the registry?). If I find the solution I will post back.